The Black Swan Inhaltsverzeichnis
Der Schwarze Schwan: Die Macht höchst unwahrscheinlicher Ereignisse ist ein Buch des Publizisten und Börsenhändlers Nassim Nicholas Taleb. Nach Taleb bezeichnet ein „Schwarzer Schwan“ ein Ereignis, das selten und höchst unwahrscheinlich ist. Black Swan – Wikipedia. veröffentlichte er unter dem Titel The Black Swan ein eigenes Buch zu dem Begriff mit Betrachtungen jenseits der Börse. Taleb bezeichnet wesentliche. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable | Taleb, Nassim Nicholas | ISBN: | Kostenloser Versand für alle Bücher mit Versand und. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable: The Impact of the Highly Improbable: With a new section: "On Robustness and Fragility" (Incerto, Band 2). In seinem Buch «The Black Swan» definiert der exzentrische Intellektuelle den Schwarzen Schwan als Ereignis mit schwerwiegenden. Das letzte Schwarze Schwan-Ereignis in der Wirtschaft war der Zusammenbruch der Lehmann-Bank im Jahr Ein Black Swan ist ein.
Im Jahr schrieb der Essayist, Forscher und ehemalige Finanzmathematiker Nassim Nicholas Taleb sein Buch „The Black Swan“. Taleb. Was unsere Mandanten über uns denken.. The Black Swan Gesellschaft für Unternehmensentwicklung mbH - Business-Coaching. powered by Google. 
Vamps Ausbruch des Coronavirus an sich ist es laut Fondsmanagern nicht. Weiterer Sport. Ihr zweites, lang erwartetes Buch The Loop wurde Feuerwehrmann Sam Phoenix Meisterwerk bezeichnet. Jahrhundertelang wurde die Existenz von schwarzen Schwänen von Wirtschaftswissenschaftlern Code Stream bestritten und die Sichter und Piper Perabo Filme darüber im besten Fall ignoriert. Werben auf NZZ. Von Nina zur Rede gestellt und befragt, Klick Stream sie am Morgen einfach kommentarlos verschwunden sei und Nina nicht rechtzeitig geweckt habe, beteuert Lily, nichts zu wissen und die Nacht mit einem der Männer aus der Bar verbracht zu haben. Das ist als klares Signal einer kommenden Rezession zu deuten. Was die Märkte aus den Angeln gehoben hat, ist die augenscheinliche Hilflosigkeit der Behörden, mit diesem Problem umzugehen. Mit dieser Methodik könnten Schwarze Schwäne viel geringere negative Auswirkungen auf den Investitionserfolg haben. März Bielefeld Taleb bezeichnet Schwarze Schwäne, die zu einem gewissen Grad erwartet werden können, Pacific Rim German Jaeger Graue Schwäne. In den USA kam der Film am 5. Virusausbrüche hat es zuvor schon gegeben, und man muss davon ausgehen, dass Ordeal Deutsch Gefahr irgendwo auf der Welt immer besteht. 
The Black Swan Get A Copy Video
BLACK SWAN - Official Trailer - FOX Searchlight NZZ abonnieren. PRO Global. März Frankfurt Am nächsten Tag erfährt Nina, dass Beth einen Autounfall hatte. Andres HeinzMark Heyman. Wenn das bedeute, dass sie erst zu späterer Stunde und damit einem kleineren Publikum gezeigt werden, werde Verstreut in Kauf genommen. Es vergingen zehn Maler Flensburg, bis die Adaption des Drehbuchs für eine Kinoproduktion fertiggestellt war. Im Mittelalter war der Alltag noch vom Aberglauben bestimmt. Häufige Fragen.Average rating 3. Rating details. More filters. Sort order. Apr 19, Aaron rated it liked it Recommends it for: Zach. This is a book that raises a number of very important questions, but chief among them is definitely the question of how the interplay between a good idea and an insufferable author combine to effect the reading experience?
This author is an a-hole. Full stop. He's dismissive, chronically insecure, unstructured and hostile towards his detractors. He engages in what may be the lowest form of rhetoric by pre-emptively attacking any critics even before they've had the chance to come forward as too This is a book that raises a number of very important questions, but chief among them is definitely the question of how the interplay between a good idea and an insufferable author combine to effect the reading experience?
He engages in what may be the lowest form of rhetoric by pre-emptively attacking any critics even before they've had the chance to come forward as too stupid or blinkered to follow his argument.
He's contemptuous towards entire disciplines economics, law, social science without making much attempt to engage with the concepts he's critiquing beyond the broadest levels of generality.
Worst of all, he's endlessly digressive, and couches his digressions in the language of capricious genius rather than simple bad writing he hits the occasional sweetnote with these tangents, but if anyone else who has read this thing cover to cover wanted to put a bullet in Yvgenia, feel free to step on up.
He's hard to like. It's unfortunate, because at the core of all of the go-nowhere anecdotes and borderline psychobabble is a good analysis on how people are psychologically and socially ill-equipped to handle unexpected outlier events which he persistently, desperately refers to as "Black Swans", one of approximately new bits of not-too-essential terminology he's trying to appropriate for himself and can't learn from our mistakes.
It's a wonderful theory for a book one third the length of this one, and I'm happy to admit that some of the better moments were probably missed by this reader simply because of the exhaustion of filtering through the surplusage.
I am sure that the failure to give this book five or six stars the possibility of a six star rating might itself be something of a Black Swan is due to my own marginal intellect.
The author has made it clear that any other explanation would be entirely unpredictable. View all 31 comments. This is a great book. And, to take a page from Taleb, anyone who doesn't think so is wrong.
No, no, there are a number of problems with the book. A bit bloated, a bit repetitive. And NNT does make the misstep every once and a while.
To take a very small instance, Taleb bases a short section of the book upon the idea that to be "hardened by the Gulag" means to become "harder" or "stronger" rather than its true meaning of someone who has become inured to certain difficulties, not necessarily strong This is a great book.
To take a very small instance, Taleb bases a short section of the book upon the idea that to be "hardened by the Gulag" means to become "harder" or "stronger" rather than its true meaning of someone who has become inured to certain difficulties, not necessarily stronger because of it.
However, this along with other problems are mere quibbles relative to the strengths of this book and, I think it's worth noting that many of the negative reviews on this site base their hostile reactions to Taleb on just such insignificant trifles.
The Black Swan deals with the fascinating topic of the nature uncertainty and approaches it from a variety of intellectual angles, mainly the psychological blocks that we are both born with and have created for ourselves that prevent our understanding of the improbable: the narrative fallacy and the problem of induction the tenuous relationship of cause and effect ; our reliance on flawed mathematical models; the expect problem.
Each one of these discussions reinforces his main argument but captivate independently as they are insights to the way we process information.
Taleb also references numerous thinkers that are not as well known in the popular consciousness and provides wonderful anecdotes and examples from their life and work that illustrate his points and entertain the reader.
Many other reviewers comment on the Taleb's unique style: arrogant and aggressive. Just because he's arrogant, however, doesn't mean he's wrong--this man has spent most of his life dedicated to this subject and it shows.
And his antagonistic style seems appropriate--it's hard to go against the establishment, even if your goal is truth; people aren't going to believe you.
He attacks the Nobel Prize in Economics because according to him, the financial models created by the prizewinners that that Swedish committee has rewarded have done a great deal of harm to people's understanding of the true economic risks involved.
These are the exclamations of narrow-minded thinkers who have yet to examine the evidence thoroughly. I, personally, found Taleb's style to be amusing and engaging.
It reflects a true passion and dedication to the beliefs he expounds in the book, beliefs that are worth some attention. If we live in a time of uncertainty, it's a good thing to understand what that really means.
View all 10 comments. Jun 21, rmn rated it liked it Shelves: financial-math-non-fiction. I can summarize this book in two words: Shit happens. Actually, I should be more fair since the author spent pages laying out his beliefs and arguing his conclusions.
The real summary of this book should be: Shit happens more often than you think. The author, Taleb, rails against economics, most philosophers, and the way we incorporate news to allow us to make sense of events and everyday happenings.
He wants us to unlearn the way we think and learn, while destroying the modern beliefs in stat I can summarize this book in two words: Shit happens.
He wants us to unlearn the way we think and learn, while destroying the modern beliefs in statistics and at the same time eviscerating the nobel prize winners who got us to where we are today.
While the author has valid points, his writing style oscillates between boring, repetitive, and just plain bad.
The author does understand his limitation to some degree and even suggests skipping certain chapters, though to be honest, the chapters he recommends skipping I found to be the best in the book.
I do recommend this for the ideas. View all 12 comments. Oct 27, Mark rated it did not like it Shelves: non-fiction.
First, a disclaimer. I am, professionally, a statistician. I do not have a Ph. I work at a factory where I assist engineers in better understanding how processes work and making things better.
I generally feel that I make a worthwhile contribution to the world. I bought and read this book because it was critical of statisticians.
I do not believe in surrounding myself with 'y First, a disclaimer. I do not believe in surrounding myself with 'yes men' in the form of books and actively seek to challenge my personal beliefs through the things I read and study.
Also, the only fields of statistics that I have ever avoided are time series forecasting and actuarial science incredibly boring. NNT as he loves to refer to himself in the book is an idiot.
Actually, he's worse than an idiot, he's a charlatan of the worst order. If I were NNT I wouldn't have to defend that statement at all, pretentious phonies reading this to feel intelligent about themselves would nod in agreement at the 'wisdom' I've laid at their feet.
One of the first things criticized in this book is the narrative for conveying information. Yet that is all NNT does in this book is lay out narrative.
No philosopher is quoted, no idea co-opted without some flourishing tale of how they were never appreciated despite their obvious intelligence or of how they were recognized for their genius but the cold, unending march of human forgetfulness relegated them to the annals of history until someone else rediscovered the idea and NNT bought the original book at a used bookstore in some non-American city that has an air of academia to it.
Later in the book, NNT makes one of his few cogent points I'll chalk it up to luck on his part. Silent evidence is a major problem everywhere we look and in every field sadly.
The negative studies are almost never published, the failures are not chronicled, etc The hard thing about silent evidence is that it's almost never available at all and we rarely recognize that we're not seeing it.
Yet NNT frequently ignores silent evidence. He discusses casinos and all the money they put into preventing cheating something that, apparently, comes from mediocristan and is easily predictable but mocks them for doing so because the biggest losses they'd suffered in recent history had nothing to do with cheating.
Apparently NNT failed to recognize that perhaps the systems in place so effectively prevented cheating that it was no longer a potential source of lost income.
Perhaps if he had looked further back in time he would have seen the financial cost of cheating. It would be like criticizing a store for employing anti-shoplifting techniques when their biggest loses came from a lost shipment, a dishonest accountant and some other unpredictable and essentially unavoidable problem.
The suggestion from NNT must be that dealing with the things we can is stupid and we should focus on the things that we cannot predict and therefore cannot prevent.
NNT spends a whole chapter discussing luck and how every successful economist, banker, investor or other scalable professional is successful not due to skill, but to luck.
I'm not going to debate that as the entire premise renders coherent arguments null and void you cannot disprove the assertion that someone is chronically lucky, well played NNT.
However, this luck doesn't apply to his favorite philosophers. NNT spends a chapter lauding Poincare for being a 'thinking mathematician' because he didn't rely on rigor, but rather intuition.
NNT lambastes other mathematicians for criticizing Poincare by calling his techniques 'hand waving' which he decides is due to childishness on the part of the other 'nerd' mathematicians.
But success due to intuition is not success due to skill and is therefore not success to be recognized or rewarded at least, that's the case with bankers and investors.
NNT doesn't understand the reason why mathematicians and other 'hard' scientists don't like hand waving is because there's no way to know if it's success or luck, it isn't repeatable and it isn't verifiable.
Also, NNT ignores the silent evidence of intuition. He looks to Poincare as a savior and steward of his profession while ignoring the unmarked graves of all the other 'thinking mathematicians' who failed miserably in their intuitive hand waving.
For all of his experimental 'proof' offered in defense of claims about how we understand, learn and process things, NNT never gives more than one study as evidence although he will claim, without a footnote or other reference that many other studies have verified that particular claim.
He accepts these theories as facts and bases large portions of his argument upon them, yet he criticizes doctors, biologists and other scientists for using experimental evidence to make theories on why things work instead of simply accepting that they do work.
How many times does he bring up 'anchoring' as a theory for why things happen, yet he cannot accept the fact that perhaps birds and humans use different brain regions to perform similar tasks?
The study didn't prove that complex models are no different from simple ones, just that not all of them were better but no claim that they were ever worse.
So why would I get rid of something that doesn't do worse but could do better? If I buy a lottery ticket that is guaranteed to make me my money back and could make me more than what I paid, why wouldn't I buy it?
Now, I understand that predicting the future is foolhardy, and I'm not saying that it's something we should put a lot of stock into pun intended but past information can give us a general idea about the future, even if it doesn't give us a great one.
NNT passes himself off as some cool headed, rational thinker who sees beyond the noise and chaos of the world and invites the world to join him on the greener side of the pasture.
But nearly all of his arguments are based on contradictions with other arguments that he has made. Further, the remaining arguments that are defensible are impossible to disprove because they impossible to prove.
Much like a believing person who argues that without empirical proof of man evolving from lower life or of the big bang, the scientist cannot be right, NNT argues that because models are not perfect, no one can use them to any benefit.
The book is altogether too long given the core point of the book which is this: the most important things that happen or that don't happen are unknowable.
Because we cannot predict the future with certainty or even near certainty, we should not even try but rather just do whatever the heck we want because sometimes it's just as good.
View all 16 comments. The first time through, I listened to this book with my husband, usually while I was cooking. Although I tried to stop and mark important passages, I ended up thinking the book was not very systematic.
The second time through, chapter by chapter, the method in his madness is more apparent. I continued to think Taleb is more a popularizer than an innovator.
But even if so, that's not so shabby. He's trying to revolutionize the way we think, and the more we rehearse that, the better.
Nassim Nichol The first time through, I listened to this book with my husband, usually while I was cooking.
While they both have us investigating our thinking, for Kahneman, it's to make us own up, while Taleb has more direct emphasis on avoiding disaster.
He would like for us to realize our overuse of normal-curve thinking, which makes us minimize risk and have no expectations out of the ordinary: like the turkey whose experience all goes to show how human beings love him and care about him and prove it by feeding him--until Thanksgiving day arrives and he's dinner.
The normal curve tells us that the further out from the mean we go, the rarity of unusual events rapidly increases. Fine--when it applies.
We are not going to meet any foot tall people or anyone living to years old. But the normal curve often doesn't apply. We can't predict which books will be best sellers or how how the sales count will go on one of them.
We can't predict when a war will occur or just how one will transpire. The world is not fair. Unfairness and inequality are no epiphenomena but part and parcel of reality.
Even in evolution, the fittest survive, thrive, and have more offspring. Take writing: before literacy, every town crier and performer had his day.
With written methods, all the little guys are out of work. Then, one book may become a bestseller. It leaves even the other books in the dust.
And when the author of the bestseller writes another book, it'll get more attention than those who didn't write a bestseller. When we think normal curves apply but they don't, we are confusing what the world is like with how we would like it to be.
We are shoving reality into the Procrustean bed of our idealized thinking. That distorts our vision of reality.
By keeping an open mind, at least, we won't be walking blindly into risk. We can't prevent the unexpected, but we can at least turn the black swans into grey swans.
We are like the 13th fairy at the Sleeping Beauty's christening. We can't do away with the angry fairy's curse, but we can mitigate it. Grey swan, not black.
The difficulty with many kinds of prognosticators in our world is that they are spinning theories that purport to predict, but their theories are stories, and their stories connect the plot points and only sound as though they are predictive.
We are lulled or, even worse, misled. We listen according to our preferred belief system. We listen to what we want to hear: confirmatory listening.
We actively cherry pick reality to make it fit what we want to believe. The solution? Try the opposite, finding something that doesn't fit.
A plethora of confirmatory evidence is exactly what the turkey had before Thanksgiving. Taleb lauds two unexpected types of practitioners: military people and financial managers.
They will know if their predictions are wrong or right. If they are wrong, they'll have to face the music. Their predictions matter. Not so the world of talking heads and stuffed shirts: they just adjust their stories and keep on going.
What those stories are, are predictions of the past. If you see an ice cube sitting on a table you can predict the future: it will melt into a little puddle of water.
But if you see a puddle on the table, and that's all you see, there could be a thousand stories of what it is and how it came to be there.
The correct explanation may be or one which will never be found. It could be that angry old fairy, melted.
As I said, most of the stories are not explanations. But theories are sticky. Once you have one you have a hard time seeing beyond it remembering that sometimes no theory is best, if the theory is wrong.
So, he recommends an empirical approach with art and craft, a less grand theory, and always an eye toward outcomes.
Right at the end it occurred to me that this is religion. He tells you how to sustain yourself in the absence of worldly support, how to stand up to others and say your piece, how to wait and be patient, and about the merits of surrounding yourself with like-minded souls.
To close, a rousing rendition of Kipling's If He can't teach like Kahneman, but he gets it said. View all 89 comments.
Dec 21, Greg rated it it was ok. This book has diminishing returns on the time spent reading it. Taleb's jeremiad is directed against - well - everyone who is not as enlightened as he is.
I trudged through this book because - well - everyone is reading it and enlightened people should know how to comment on it. There, I did it.
Now I can look down on all those people out there who aren't enlightened like Taleb. And now, me. Taleb is actually on to something important if you can tolerate his self-importance enough to filter his v This book has diminishing returns on the time spent reading it.
Taleb is actually on to something important if you can tolerate his self-importance enough to filter his verbage to get his good ideas.
A central idea is that we assume everything in the world is Gaussian and then we base all our decisions about life on our Gaussian models. But the significant, life-changing, society-changing, events are outside the Gaussian.
Things like They belong to Extremestan, not Mediocristan. The ideas are interesting. Many are quite compelling. But it really seems Taleb's main point is "everyone else is an idiot.
I did find quite useful a good line of thought regarding the importance of narrative in grasping truth.
We are so drawn to narrative, that all retained "true" facts must fit into our constructed narrative. Other data are ignored or made to fit. We need to be on the watch for data that disproves rather than confirms our story.
And perhaps we ought to learn better how to understand and speak in story. Mmm - God himself, in the person of Jesus, communicated truth in parables - narratives!
No one else seems to have caught on. Except Taleb, of course. View 2 comments. Aug 23, Daniel rated it it was ok. I stopped reading this because the author is so pompous and annoying.
View all 5 comments. Jan 26, Ted rated it liked it Shelves: psychology , philosophy , math , economics , reviews-liked. Taleb is a pretty good writer, but I thought this was a very uneven book.
I know her as Jackie from "That 70's Show," and nothing else. She damned near steals the show. That's right, in a move where she shares screen with Natalie Portman, AND Vincent Cassel she is able to not only hold her own, but walk away with some scenes.
The interplay between her wild, unrestrained Lilly, and Portman's frightened, tightly wound Nina creates a brilliant external tension to match, and at times overpower, the internal tension that lies at the very core of Nina.
I have been a fan of Aronofsky's work since I saw "Pi" on it's original theatrical run I think I was the only person in the theater for that midnight show , and he has yet to disappoint.
He has a definite point of view and a thematic core that runs through his work. Thematically, this is in keeping with most of Aronofsky's work.
It's about control and the loss of that control. What happens when a perfectionist control freak is in a position where she HAS to let go of that control?
What takes over when she does let go? In typical fashion, Aronofsky shows us that sometimes in striving to get what we want, we risk losing a part of us that we may never be able to get back, and don't realize how desperately we need.
Read more from me at www. Looking for some great streaming picks? Check out some of the IMDb editors' favorites movies and shows to round out your Watchlist.
Visit our What to Watch page. Sign In. Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Full Cast and Crew. Release Dates.
Official Sites. Company Credits. Technical Specs. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites. User Reviews. User Ratings.
External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos. Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions. Rate This.
A committed dancer struggles to maintain her sanity after winning the lead role in a production of Tchaikovsky's "Swan Lake".
Director: Darren Aronofsky. Available on Amazon. She hides the corpse and returns to the stage, where she loses herself and gives a flawless performance as Odile.
Nina receives a standing ovation from the audience and, after surprising Thomas with a passionate kiss, returns to her dressing room.
While changing, Nina hears a knock at the door and opens it to find Lily alive and congratulating her. Realizing the fight never occurred, yet the mirror is still broken, she also realizes that she actually stabbed herself and pulls a shard of glass from her own abdomen.
After dancing the final act, in which Odette attempts to commit suicide by throwing herself off a cliff but instead falls onto a hidden mattress, the theater erupts in thunderous applause while Thomas, Lily, and the rest of the cast all gather to congratulate Nina.
They then discover that she is bleeding profusely. Thomas orders some of the dancers to go get help and frantically asks Nina what happened to her.
Nina replies to him that her performance was perfect and loses consciousness as the screen slowly fades to blinding white light and the credits roll.
During the closing credits, the major cast members were credited both as their film characters as well as their corresponding characters from Swan Lake.
The basic idea for the film started when he hired screenwriters to rework a screenplay called The Understudy , which portrayed off-Broadway actors and explored the notion of being haunted by a double.
The director had also seen numerous productions of Swan Lake , and he connected the duality of the White Swan and the Black Swan to the script. Regardless, the director found active and inactive dancers to share their experiences with him.
Aronofsky called Black Swan a companion piece to his previous film The Wrestler , recalling one of his early projects about a love affair between a wrestler and a ballerina.
He eventually separated the wrestling and the ballet worlds as "too much for one movie". He compared the two films: "Wrestling some consider the lowest art—if they would even call it art—and ballet some people consider the highest art.
But what was amazing to me was how similar the performers in both of these worlds are. They both make incredible use of their bodies to express themselves.
Aronofsky first discussed with Portman the possibility of a ballet film in , and he found she was interested in playing a ballet dancer.
Kunis contrasted Lily with Nina, "My character is very loose She's not as technically good as Natalie's character, but she has more passion, naturally.
That's what [Nina] lacks. He compared his character to George Balanchine , who co-founded New York City Ballet and was "a control freak, a true artist using sexuality to direct his dancers".
Portman and Kunis started training six months before the start of filming in order to attain a body type and muscle tone more similar to those of professional dancers.
A few months closer to filming, she began choreography training. You wear a tutu and you stand on stage and you look cute and twirl.
But this is very different because you can't fake it. You can't just stay in there and like pretend you know what you're doing.
Your whole body has to be structured differently. She stated: "Natalie took class, she studied for several months, from the waist up is her.
In addition to the soloist performances, members of the Pennsylvania Ballet were cast as the corps de ballet , backdrop for the main actors' performances.
Aronofsky and Portman first discussed a ballet film in , after the release of Requiem for a Dream , though the script had not yet been written.
The screenplay The Understudy was written by Andres Heinz; Aronofsky first heard about it while editing his second film Requiem for a Dream and described it as " All About Eve with a double, set in the off-Broadway world.
In July , Kunis was cast. Principal photography was achieved using Super 16 mm cameras and began in New York City toward the end of I like Super 16 because the cameras are really light, really moveable.
Also, for The Wrestler it was a money-saving thing. The film stocks on 35mm would become so glossy that they'd get close to what people are doing on video.
Like with wrestling, ballet is shot in wide shot with two shots on the side, and no one really brought the camera—well, wrestling—into the ring or for us, onto the stage and into the practice room.
I couldn't think of another example where they did that I was concerned if that would affect the suspense, but after a while I said, "screw it, let's go for it.
The non-original music featured in Black Swan consists of music by Tchaikovsky featuring performances on-screen and in the soundtrack by violinist Tim Fain [30] and a track of electronica dance music by English production duo The Chemical Brothers.
It marks the fifth consecutive collaboration between Aronofsky and English composer Clint Mansell , who composed the original score for the film.
Mansell attempted to score the film based on Tchaikovsky's ballet [31] but with radical changes to the music. The Chemical Brothers' music, which is featured prominently during the club scene in Black Swan , is omitted from the soundtrack album.
Black Swan had its world premiere as the opening film at the 67th Venice Film Festival on September 1, It received a standing ovation whose length Variety said made it "one of the strongest Venice openers in recent memory".
Clooney is a wonderful actor, and he will always be welcome in Venice. But it was as simple as that. According to The Independent , the film was considered one of "the most highly anticipated" films of late The newspaper then compared it to the ballet film The Red Shoes in having "a nightmarish quality Black Swan had a limited release in select cities in North America on December 3, , in 18 theaters [46] and was a surprise box office success.
The per location average was the second highest for the opening weekend of behind The King's Speech.
The website's critical consensus reads, "Bracingly intense, passionate, and wildly melodramatic, Black Swan glides on Darren Aronofsky's bold direction—and a bravura performance from Natalie Portman.
In September , Entertainment Weekly reported that based on reviews from the film's screening at the Venice Film Festival, "[ Black Swan ] is already set to be one of the year's most love-it-or-hate-it movies.
Some found its theatricality maddening, but most declared themselves 'swept away'. Kurt Loder of Reason magazine called the film "wonderfully creepy", and wrote that "it's not entirely satisfying; but it's infused with the director's usual creative brio, and it has a great dark gleaming look.
Goodridge described Portman's performance, "[She] is captivating as Nina Goodridge praised Libatique's cinematography with the dance scenes and the psychologically "unnerving" scenes: "It's a mesmerising psychological ride that builds to a gloriously theatrical tragic finale as Nina attempts to deliver the perfect performance.
Kirk Honeycutt of The Hollywood Reporter gave the film a mixed review. He wrote, "[ Black Swan ] is an instant guilty pleasure, a gorgeously shot, visually complex film whose badness is what's so good about it.
You might howl at the sheer audacity of mixing mental illness with the body-fatiguing, mind-numbing rigors of ballet, but its lurid imagery and a hellcat competition between two rival dancers is pretty irresistible.
The critic said of the thematic mashup, "Aronofsky The film has been criticized for its portrayal of ballet and ballet dancers.
Rojo called the film "lazy It doesn't show why ballet is so important to us — why we would want to try so hard. Amy Westcott is credited as the costume designer and received several award nominations.
A publicized controversy arose regarding the question of who had designed 40 ballet costumes for Portman and the dancers.
An article in the British newspaper The Independent suggested those costumes had actually been created by Rodarte 's Kate and Laura Mulleavy.
Furthermore, the corps ballet's costumes were designed by Zack Brown for the American Ballet Theatre , and slightly adapted by Westcott and her costume design department.
Westcott said: "Controversy is too complimentary a word for two people using their considerable self-publicising resources to loudly complain about their credit once they realized how good the film is.
We know that Natalie Portman studied ballet as a kid and had a year of intensive training for the film, but that doesn't add up to being a ballerina.
However, it seems that many people believe that Portman did her own dancing in Black Swan. Black Swan appeared on many critics' top ten lists of and is frequently considered to be one of the best films of the year.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Not to be confused with the swashbuckler film The Black Swan film or Black swan theory.
Mike Medavoy Arnold W. Messer Brian Oliver Scott Franklin.
He also does a brilliant job of creating the world that these characters inhabit. Retrieved October 9, More generally, decision theorywhich is based Ruggero Pasquarelli a fixed universe or a model of possible outcomes, ignores and minimizes the effect of events that are "outside the model". I stopped reading Wolfgang Und Anneliese book shortly after that page. You will accumulate more knowledge and more books as you grow older, and the growing number of unread books Cat Women the shelves will Sons Of Anarchy Stream Bs at you menancingly. This is a great book. Open Preview See a Problem?
Dieser Gedanke fällt gerade übrigens
Mir ist diese Situation bekannt. Ist fertig, zu helfen.